For the
past decades, we’re constantly being told that Artificial Intelligence
represents at the same time a huge step forward for mankind, and a threat to
its existence. Robots are gradually replacing us in basic tasks of our daily
life. Their role increases in science, to the point that robots are now able to make
robots themselves.
Naively, we’ve
been always hoping that the artistic fields, such as music or literature, will
remain the prerogative of men upon robots, since they deal with sensitivity. It’s
a quite unique feature that robots can’t possibly have, and can’t reproduce it
either. Apparently, we’ve been wrong. In fact, machines are now able to compose
music and to paint, just like humans. We got used to the fact that robots could
be sometimes more efficient than “human” musicians. But could we predict that
they would also become composers?
Analysing
thousands of masterpieces, integrating the data, and identifying the general
characteristics of specific kinds of music, robots can now, compose such songs
that couldn’t be distinguished from “human ones”. The most striking example of it happened in 1997, when several musicologists didn’t succeed to determine who wrote a piece. They
unanimously asserted it was composed by Bach, while it was just a computer
(EMI) using complex algorithms.
Back in
1957, the first song was written by an AI machine. This is what it looked like:
More recently, the song Daddy's Car went viral as it sounded just like a
band playing (with an influence of the Beatles), but was entirely
composed by AI.
The
objective, however, was to create a tool for musicians – a source of
inspiration to write new original melodies. Though there should be something
pretty frustrating in thinking that machines (that we mastered by the way) are
more creative than we are… Don’t you think so?
Original article from L'Express: here
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire